<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ninja vs Penguin - Latest Comments in Filming for the Cut</title><link>http://ninjavspenguin.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ninjavspenguin.disqus.com/filming_for_the_cut/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:00:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Filming for the Cut</title><link>http://www.ninjavspenguin.com/blog/2008/08/21/filming-for-the-cut/#comment-1827947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've found that storyboarding is so important.  It's a quick way to make your film without having to commit that many resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NinjaVsPenguin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Filming for the Cut</title><link>http://www.ninjavspenguin.com/blog/2008/08/21/filming-for-the-cut/#comment-1826015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did the same thing you did at first... shooting for coverage.  But more and more I switched to shooting for the cut.  I haven't done it in awhile, but that's still my preferred technique, and I sometimes use shot lists or story boards to make sure I get what I want for the editing room.  The more you do it the easier it gets to cut the thing together in your head as you shoot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also agree with you.  If you have a single camera, a mix of shooting for the cut and shooting coverage is probably best.  Shoot with a plan for what you'll need and get all those shots.  If there's extra time, shoot a bit of coverage for some extra options incase things don't look the way you had originally envisioned when you get to editting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>